Ramos
Ramos v. Pistiolas
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OSCAR RAMOS, No. 2:24-cv-02117-SCR 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.
STAVROULA PISTIOLAS,
15 Defendant. 17 The parties this case have consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); ECF No. 13. Accordingly, this matter was assigned to the undersigned for all purposes. ECF No. 13. Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14), which the Court heard on February 13, 2025. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is granted. I. Background and Procedural History Plaintiff filed this action on August 6, 2024. Plaintiff alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq.) (herein “ADA”) and California state law, including violation of California Civil Code §§ 51, et seq. (the Unruh Act).1 27 California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act “operates virtually identically to the ADA.” Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc., 481 F.3d 724, 731 (9th…