(PS) Boddie v. Blue Diamond Growers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20252:24-cv-02288California459 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC S. BODDIE, No. 2:24-cv-02288-TLN-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff filed a pro se civil complaint and this matter was referred to the undersigned by 18 Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). By order signed and filed on March 13, 19 2025 (ECF No. 3), the undersigned screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), 20 advised plaintiff of the deficiencies in the complaint, dismissed the complaint with leave to 21 amend, and granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that 22 failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be 23 dismissed. The time granted for plaintiff to file an amended complaint has expired. Plaintiff has 24 neither filed an amended complaint nor sought an extension of time to do so. 25 In recommending this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the court has 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.