Tarver

1 2 3

4 5

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TED ARTHUR KING, Case No. 2:24-cv-03757-DAD-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

14 RUSSELL LEE TARVER, et al., DISMISS (ECF No. 7) AND TO DENY

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

15 Defendants. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ECF NO. 13); ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 16 MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING (ECF No. 16) 17

18

19 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by defendants Sacramento 22 County and Santiago James Garcia, which is fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 7, 8, 10.) Also 23 pending are plaintiff Ted Arthur King’s motions for a preliminary injunction and for 24 electronic filing. (ECF Nos. 13, 16.) Plaintiff is proceeding pro se.1 Pursuant to Local 25 Rule 230(g), the motion to dismiss and motion for a preliminary injunction are submitted 26 on the record and briefs. A hearing is not typically held for motions to use electronic 27 1 This matter proceeds…