Tarver
(PS) King v. Tarver
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TED ARTHUR KING, Case No. 2:24-cv-03757-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
RUSSELL LEE TARVER, et al., DISMISS (ECF No. 7) AND TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
Defendants. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ECF NO. 13); ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING (ECF No. 16)
19 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by defendants Sacramento County and Santiago James Garcia, which is fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 7, 8, 10.) Also pending are plaintiff Ted Arthur King’s motions for a preliminary injunction and for electronic filing. (ECF Nos. 13, 16.) Plaintiff is proceeding pro se.1 Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the motion to dismiss and motion for a preliminary injunction are submitted on the record and briefs. A hearing is not typically held for motions to use electronic 27 This matter proceeds…