Powell

(PC) Uriel Garcia v. Powell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20251:19-cv-01631California6,261 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 URIEL GARCIA, Case No.: 1:19-cv-01631-KES-CDB (PC) Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

POWELL, et al., (Doc. 58) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Uriel Garcia is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Powell, Hurtado, and Ugwueze for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff’s claims on November 18, 2024. (Doc. 58.) Plaintiff filed an opposition (Doc. 64) on January 27, 2025, and Defendants replied (Doc. 65) on January 29, 2025. II. APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS Motions for Summary Judgment Summary judgment is appropriate when it is demonstrated that there “is no genuine dispute as to any material fact…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.