Secretary

(PC) Smith v. Secretary

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20251:23-cv-00526California815 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH, No. 1:23-cv-00526-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING THIRD AMENDED

COMPLAINT FOR EXCEEDING 25-PAGE

13 v. LIMITATION 14 SECRETARY, et al., (ECF No. 42) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On November 4, 2024, Plaintiff’s motion to stay the proceeding was denied by the District 20 Judge, and Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a third amended complaint in compliance with 21 the Court’s screening order. (ECF No. 41) 22 On December 6, 2024, Plaintiff filed a third amended complaint. (ECF No. 42.) In 23 preparing to screen the third amended complaint, the Court noted that it is pages fifty-four pages 24 in length, and includes multiple unrelated claims and defendants.1 (Id.) 25 Plaintiff is advised that he may not bring unrelated claims against unrelated parties in a 26 single action. Fed. R. Civ. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.