Vang

(PC) Eidem v. Vang

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20251:23-cv-01198California4,934 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668 D. Shawn Burkley. Esq. Attorney General of California SBN: 310129 LE-MAI D. LYONS, State Bar No. 285756 D. SHAWN BURKLEY, Supervising Deputy Attorney General ATTORNEY-AT-LAW S. GRAY GILMOR, State Bar No. 344232 14900 Magnolia Blvd. #56747 Deputy Attorney General Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 600 West Broadway, Suite 1800 Mobile: (818) 268-9858 San Diego, CA 92101 shawn@burkleyhouse.com Telephone: (619) 873-8830 Fax: (619) 645-2581 E-mail: Gray.Gilmor@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants C. Vang IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 ANTHONY EIDEM, 1:23-cv-01198 JLT BAM 13 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 v. Judge: The Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe

VANG, et al., Defendants. 18 I. GENERAL 1. Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.