(SS) Saetern v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20251:24-cv-01174California3,335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 SOU SAETERN, Case No. 1:24-cv-01174-EPG Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

v. SECURITY COMPLAINT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF Nos. 1, 13, 18).

Defendant. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding his application for supplemental security income benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF Nos. 8, 9). Plaintiff argues as follows: “The RFC/MRFC are not supported by substantial evidence.” (ECF No. 13 at 2). Having reviewed the record, administrative transcript, parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, the Court finds as follows. \\\ Plaintiff argues that “the ALJ harmfully erred by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.