Ali

Ali v. Bridgecrest Credit Company LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20251:24-cv-01364California1,471 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 HUSSEIN ALI, Case No. 1:24-cv-01364-JLT-EPG 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND 12 RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS v. THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

BRIDGECREST CREDIT COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

14 COMPANY, LLC AND LOCAL RULE 183(b)

15 Defendant. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY,

DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

16 17 18 Plaintiff Hussein Ali is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed on October 3, 19 2024, against Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC (“Bridgecrest” or “Defendant”). On 20 November 13, 2024, Bridgecrest filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a 21 claim. (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Plaintiff has not otherwise appeared 22 in this case since its removal from state court, and all of mail the Court has sent Plaintiff has 23 been returned as undeliverable. 24 Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with a court order and Local Rule 183(b), both of 25 which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.