Ali

Ali v. Bridgecrest Credit Company LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20251:24-cv-01364California1,471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 HUSSEIN ALI, Case No. 1:24-cv-01364-JLT-EPG 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS v. THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

BRIDGECREST CREDIT COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

COMPANY, LLC AND LOCAL RULE 183(b)

Defendant. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY,

DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

16 17 Plaintiff Hussein Ali is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed on October 3, 2024, against Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC (“Bridgecrest” or “Defendant”). On November 13, 2024, Bridgecrest filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Plaintiff has not otherwise appeared in this case since its removal from state court, and all of mail the Court has sent Plaintiff has been returned as undeliverable. Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with a court order and Local Rule 183(b), both of which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.