Schultz

(HC) (DP) Osband v. Schultz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20252:97-cv-00152California478 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE IAN OSBAND, No. 2:97-cv-0152 KJM CSK Petitioner, v. DEATH PENALTY CASE JASON SCHULTZ, ACTING WARDEN, ORDER Respondent.1 16 On April 22, 2025, a remote status conference was held before this Court regarding petitioner’s seventeenth and unopposed motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations filed September 8, 2023. (ECF Nos. 707, 757.) Assistant Federal Defender Brian Abbington and attorney Tim Brosnan appeared on behalf of petitioner. Deputy Attorney General Erin Doering appeared on behalf of respondent. At the time petitioner filed the pending motion, petitioner did not anticipate filing further requests for extensions of time to file objections. (See ECF No. 757.) For the reasons stated at the remote hearing, including Mr. Brosnan’s recent computer hacking experience that occurred after the

1 The pending motion for extension of time indicates that Jason…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.