(PS) Whitford v. Lassen County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20252:24-cv-01650California1,099 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM BRETT WHITFORD, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-01650-TLN-CSK 12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO

13 v. PROSECUTE 14 LASSEN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiffs William Brett Whitford and Jacqueline Marie Costa, proceeding without 18 counsel, filed this action on June 10, 2024.1 (ECF No. 1.) On December 26, 2024, the 19 Court issued an order denying Plaintiffs’ request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), 20 and directing Plaintiffs to pay the filing fee or each complete and sign an application to 21 proceed IFP, refile a signed Complaint bearing signatures of each Plaintiff, and for 22 Plaintiff Costa to provide her current address within thirty (30) days of the date of the 23 order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiffs did not respond. On March 10, 2025, the Court issued an 24 order to show cause ordering Plaintiffs to respond and pay the filing fee or each 25 complete and sign an application to proceed IFP, refile a signed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.