Trump

(PS) Wooten v. Trump

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20252:25-cv-00873California1,892 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ROBERT WOOTEN, No. 2:25-cv-0873 DC AC (PS) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 DONALD J. TRUMP, 14 Defendant. 15 16 On March 17, 2025, plaintiff filed this action in pro se and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. 17 The case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The complaint 18 contains a request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, which was 19 referred to the undersigned by the District Judge for preparation of findings and 20 recommendations. ECF No. 6. On April 1, 2025, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, 21 again containing a request for a temporary restraining order. ECF No. 8. The undersigned 22 reviewed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and, believing that this court lacks subject 23 matter jurisdiction to hear plaintiff’s case and that this case must be dismissed, issued an order to 24 show cause requiring plaintiff to identify the basis for subject matter jurisdiction. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.