Redick III v. County of Tuolumne
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12 STANLEY E. REDICK, III, Case No. 2:25-cv-02530-ODW-BFM 13 Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
14 v. TRANSFER VENUE TO
EASTERN DISTRICT OF
15 COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, et al., CALIFORNIA 16 Defendant. 17
18 19 On March 21, 2025, Plaintiff Stanley E. Redick III filed a civil rights 20 complaint in this District. (ECF 1.) In a declaration attached to the Complaint, 21 Plaintiff states that he was wrongfully arrested for theft, and that the charges 22 were ultimately dismissed. (ECF 2 at 2.) Plaintiff claims that the judge assigned 23 to the case, Tuolumne County Superior Court Judge Siebert, acted improperly. 24 (ECF 2 at 2.) He alleges judicial and prosecutorial misconduct. (ECF 1 at 3.) 25 Plaintiff names as Defendants Tuolumne County; Judge Siebert; and Judge 26 Laura Krieg, who prosecuted Plaintiff and is now a sitting superior court judge 27 in Tuolumne County. (ECF 1 at 2.) Tuolumne County is in the Eastern District 28 1 2 The federal venue statute requires that a…