David Peasley v. M. Spearman

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 202523-15471California1,158 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 24 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID SCOTT PEASLEY, No. 23-15471

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:15-cv-01769-JSW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 5, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, BEA, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

David Peasley appeals from the district court’s order granting summary

judgment in favor of Officers Gibson, Orozco, and Maria Lopez.** Peasley alleges

that the officers violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment on two occasions

by denying him access to necessary medical care for his Type 1 diabetes. Peasley

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The first names of Officers Gibson and Orozco are not apparent from the record. also appeals the denial of his request for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.