Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. v. Mitchell
Opinion
Opinion
M. SMITH, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC., No. 24-2379 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:23-cv-00067-
MJP
v.
STEVEN MITCHELL; DORI OPINION
MITCHELL; JEROME HOPPER;
LORI HOPPER,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 1, 2025 Pasadena, California Filed April 24, 2025 Before: MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and LAWRENCE VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and JANE MAGNUS- STINSON, District Judge. * Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.
* The Honorable Jane Magnus-Stinson, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Indiana, sitting by designation. 2 OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC. V. MITCHELL
SUMMARY **
Arbitration
The panel affirmed the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., which sought a declaration that the Defendants, the alleged victims of a Ponzi scheme, were not its customers and therefore not entitled to arbitration; and entering a permanent injunction prohibiting Defendants…