Peacock
Peacock v. Pabst Brewing Company
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
APR 24 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRENDAN PEACOCK, No. 24-2494 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:18-cv-00568-DJC-CKD v.
MEMORANDUM*
PABST BREWING COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Court, Presiding
Submitted April 9, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Brendan Peacock appeals the district court’s denial of class certification and
the grant of summary judgment against his claims under California’s Unfair
Competition Law (“UCL”) for allegedly false or deceptive advertising. He claims
that Defendant-Appellee Pabst Brewing Co. (“Pabst”) misled consumers with the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). labeling on its now-discontinued Olympia Beer…