Menefield

Menefield v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 202523-2108California664 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 24 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES W. MENEFIELD, No. 23-2108

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-03812-PA-E

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION; CONNIE

GIPSON; JOSIE GASTELO, Former Warden of California Men's Colony,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 24, 2025**

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner James W. Menefield appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendant

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). prison officials failed to protect him from COVID-19. We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.