Menefield
Menefield v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 202523-2108California664 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 24 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES W. MENEFIELD, No. 23-2108
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-03812-PA-E
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION; CONNIE
GIPSON; JOSIE GASTELO, Former Warden of California Men's Colony,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 24, 2025**
Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner James W. Menefield appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendant
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). prison officials failed to protect him from COVID-19. We have jurisdiction…