Fallon

Fallon v. Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 202524-241California1,227 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 24 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MYA NOELIA FALLON, No. 24-241 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:22-cv-01877-JAT v.

MEMORANDUM*

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 23, 2024 ** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Mya Noelia Fallon appeals from the district court’s decision affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for Supplemental

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Security Income under the Social Security Act.1 We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s order de novo and reverse only if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.