Arteaga-Gonzalez

Arteaga-Gonzalez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 202523-1482California453 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

APR 24 2025

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

GUILLERMA ARTEAGA-GONZALEZ, No. 23-1482

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-536-868

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 3, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: W. FLETCHER, WALLACH***, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Guillerma Arteaga-Gonzalez (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

denying her application for cancellation of removal. We deny the petition.

Petitioner claims that the BIA erred in concluding that she failed to establish

the requisite hardship to her qualifying children under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D).

We review “[o]nly the question whether th[e] established facts satisfy the statutory

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.