Sugarman

Sugarman v. IRZ Consulting, LLC

Good Law
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 202519-01033California3,638 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 FRESNO DIVISION

4

5 In re ) Case No. 18-11651-B-11 ) 6 GREGORY JOHN te VELDE, ) ) 7 Debtor. ) ) 8 ) RANDY SUGARMAN, CHAPTER 11 ) Adv. Proceeding No. 19-1033-B 9 TRUSTEE ) ) Docket Control No. DCT-2 10 Plaintiff, ) v. ) 11 IRZ CONSULTING, LLC, aka IRZ )

CONSTRUCTION DIVISION, LLC, )

12 ) Defendant. ) 13 ) ) 14 AND RELATED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT )

AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS. )

15 )

16

17

18 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR

DE NOVO CONSIDERATION OF THE DISTRICT COURT

19 AS TO DARI-TECH, INC.’S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

20 —————————————————————————————

21 Shanon J. Slack, SLACK LAW GROUP, APC, for Dari-Tech, Inc., Duncan Turner, BADGLEY MULLINS TURNER PLLC, for Dari-Tech,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.