In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20253:22-cv-03580California1,285 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE META PIXEL HEALTHCARE Case No. 22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)

LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

ORDER RE MARCH 25, 2025

All Actions. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE META'S

RFP

10 Re: Dkt. No. 930

12 The parties ask the Court to resolve their dispute regarding whether plaintiffs should be required to produce documents showing the cookies on their devices and browsers, in response to Meta’s Request for Production of Documents (“RFP”) 74. Dkt. No. 930. The Court finds this dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). As explained below, the Court orders plaintiffs to produce documents sufficient to show all third-party cookies on plaintiffs’ relevant devices and/or browsers capable of collecting or sharing health information. I. BACKGROUND Meta’s RFP 74 asks plaintiffs to produce all documents showing “the cookies on [plaintiffs’] devices and/or browsers” for every device and browser plaintiffs used to access their …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.