In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN RE META PIXEL HEALTHCARE Case No. 22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)
LITIGATION
8 This Document Relates To:
ORDER RE MARCH 25, 2025
9 All Actions. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE META'S
RFP 74
10 Re: Dkt. No. 930 11
12 13 The parties ask the Court to resolve their dispute regarding whether plaintiffs should be 14 required to produce documents showing the cookies on their devices and browsers, in response to 15 Meta’s Request for Production of Documents (“RFP”) 74. Dkt. No. 930. The Court finds this 16 dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). 17 As explained below, the Court orders plaintiffs to produce documents sufficient to show all 18 third-party cookies on plaintiffs’ relevant devices and/or browsers capable of collecting or sharing 19 health information. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Meta’s RFP 74 asks plaintiffs to produce all documents showing “the cookies on 22 [plaintiffs’] devices and/or browsers” for every device and browser plaintiffs used to access their 23 …