United States v. Stratics Networks Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No.: 23-cv-313-BAS-KSC
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER FOLLOWING JOINT
13 v. DISCOVERY STATEMENT 14 STRATIC NETWORKS, INC. et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On April 21, 2025, plaintiff, the United States of America, and defendants Atlas 18 Investment Ventures LLC, Tek Ventures, LLC, Eric Peterson, Todd DiRoberto, and Atlas 19 Marketing Partners, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Atlas”) lodged a discovery letter and 20 exhibits, pursuant to the undersigned’s Chambers Rules. Doc. No. 158. After review of that 21 submission, the Court ORDERS: 22 I. Atlas’ Amended Privilege Log 23 Atlas’ March 20, 2025 Amended Privilege Log is so lacking in detail the Court 24 cannot assess the applicability of the claimed privileges. It also still does not meet the 25 Court’s minimum requirements. See Mag. J. Karen S. Crawford Civ. Chambers R. IX. 26 (S.D. Cal., Mar. 26, 2025). Necessary but missing information includes: 27 1)…