Stelly

Stelly v. Shiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20253:24-cv-06775California642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KAMANI COURVOISIER STELLY, Case No. 24-cv-06775-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL

v. TIME TO FILE SIGNED AMENDED

COMPLAINT

SHIFFER, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff, an inmate in the Martinez Detention Facility (“MDF”) proceeding without representation by an attorney, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathaniel E. Cousins, and Plaintiff consented to his jurisdiction. (ECF No. 4.) Judge Cousins reviewed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and determined that Plaintiff stated claims capable of judicial determination against Defendants Deputy Kapustin and Deputy Shiffer for using excessive force. (ECF No. 7 at 2:20-21.) Judge Cousins concluded Plaintiff’s remaining claims were not capable of judicial determination (see id. at 3:4-8 (addressing claims against Deputy Cubit); id. at 3:9-22 (addressing claims regarding the condition of his cell); id. at 3:23-4:9 (addressing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.