Heitkoetter

Heitkoetter v. Domm

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20251:22-cv-00368California2,696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARKUS HEITKOETTER, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-0368-KES-BAM Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO COMPEL THE

v. DEPOSITION OF EMMETT MOORE AND

FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST EMMETT

KARL DOMM, MOORE AND DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL Defendant. (Doc. 132) 16

Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Markus Heitkoetter and Rockwell Trading Services, LLC’s (“Plaintiffs”) motion to compel the deposition of Emmett Moore and motion for sanctions against Emmett Moore and Defendant’s counsel. (Doc. 132.) Having considered the briefing, and the entire docket, and for the reasons discussed below, the Court denies Plaintiffs’ motion to compel the deposition of Emmett Moore and further denies all related requests for sanctions. I. Brief Factual and Procedural Background In the interest of brevity, the Court highlights pertinent parts of the case background. Plaintiffs Markus Heitkoetter and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.