Spingola
Spingola v. Deputy Ujdar
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMES SPINGOLA, Case No. 25-cv-00557-JSC
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER OF SERVICE
v. 9
10 DEPUTY UJDAR, et al., Defendants. 11
12 INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiff, an inmate at the Alameda County Jail who is proceeding without representation 14 by an attorney, filed this civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against two deputies in the 15 Alameda County Sherriff’s Department. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted in a 16 separate order. For the reasons discussed below, the complaint state claims capable of judicial 17 determination and review, and the service is ordered upon Defendants. 18 STANDARD OF REVIEW 19 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek 20 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 21 1915A(a). The Court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of 22 the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous,…