Seiko Epson Corporation v. Burkwitz Solutions Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20252:24-cv-10133California1,607 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT J S-6

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan Civil No. 2:24-cv-10133-SVW-AS corporation; EPSON AMERICA, INC., a California corporation; and EPSON PORTLAND INC., an Oregon corporation, FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT AS Plaintiffs TO BURKWITZ SOLUTIONS, INC. V. BURKWITZ SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation; ARMEN SARGSYAN, an individual; and SIMON MIKAIL, an individual, Defendants.

CONSENT JUDGMENT

The parties having considered the facts and applicable law and having agreed to the entry of this Stipulated Final Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction (“Consent Judgment”), and the parties having stipulated that there is no just reason for delaying entry of final judgment in this action as to Burkwitz Solutions, Inc., (referred to herein as “Defendant”), it is hereby ordered,

adjudged, and decreed as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Plaintiff Seiko Epson Corporation (“Seiko Epson”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan. Its principal place of business is located at 3-3-5 Owa Suwashi Nagano-Ken, 392-8502, Japan. Seiko Epson is in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.