Reybol

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ARCELIO JOSEPH REYBOL, Case No. 25-cv-02712-TSH

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

9 v.

10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 11 Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiff Arcelio Joseph Reybol initiated this lawsuit by filing a complaint (ECF No. 1) and 14 application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). Based on the information provided in his 15 application, the Court was unable to determine whether Plaintiff is entitled to proceed in forma 16 pauperis. For instance, when asked if he is presently employed, Plaintiff answered “No,” but he 17 wrote “Bloomber + Threadneedle” next to his answer. ECF No. 2 at 1. Plaintiff also crossed out 18 many of the printed words on the first page. Id. When asked if he has received any money from 19 certain listed sources within the past 12 months, Plaintiff checked yes for “Business, Profession or 20 self employment,” “Income from stocks, bonds, or royalties,” and “Federal or State welfare 21 payments, Social Security or other government source,” but he did not state the…