Reybol

Reybol v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20253:25-cv-02712California402 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARCELIO JOSEPH REYBOL, Case No. 25-cv-02712-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Arcelio Joseph Reybol initiated this lawsuit by filing a complaint (ECF No. 1) and application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). Based on the information provided in his application, the Court was unable to determine whether Plaintiff is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. For instance, when asked if he is presently employed, Plaintiff answered “No,” but he wrote “Bloomber + Threadneedle” next to his answer. ECF No. 2 at 1. Plaintiff also crossed out many of the printed words on the first page. Id. When asked if he has received any money from certain listed sources within the past 12 months, Plaintiff checked yes for “Business, Profession or self employment,” “Income from stocks, bonds, or royalties,” and “Federal or State welfare payments, Social Security or other government source,” but he did not state the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.