Ruizpaz

Ruizpaz v. Matteson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20255:22-cv-05973California1,044 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARLOS RUIZPAZ, Case No. 22-cv-05973-NW

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(WARDEN) SOLANO C. S. P., Re: ECF No. 28 Respondent.

12 Petitioner Carlos Ruizpaz seeks a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a conviction from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Currently before the Court for decision is Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition pursuant to the doctrine of abstention, see Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), on the basis that Ruizpaz’s criminal case is currently pending in the California Supreme Court. ECF No. 28. Ruizpaz, who does not dispute that his criminal case is still pending in the California Supreme Court, filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss and requests that the Court dismiss the petition without prejudice on March 24, 2025. ECF No. 31. For the reasons outlined below, the Court GRANTS the motion to …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.