(PC) Puckett v. Houston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, No. 2:17-cv-0640 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. HOUSTON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On April 17, 2025, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Notice to Court,” claiming he amended his “case on July 1, 2017,” and received no response. (ECF No. 10 at 1.) As discussed below, this case was terminated at plaintiff’s voluntary request on August 14, 2017, and his motion regarding settlement is denied. I. PLAINTIFF’S RECENT FILING While plaintiff was housed at California State Prison, Sacramento (“CSP-SAC”), he filed his request for case status, and appended a document styled, “Motion for Agreed Statement and Agreed Settled Statement of Facts. . . .” (Id. at 2.) In this motion, plaintiff includes a laundry list of alleged violations, including discrimination, racial profiling, and bias, and claims defendants Houston and Swarthout have verbally insulted and…