Pallares

(HC) Bradford v. Pallares

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20252:21-cv-01093California308 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSICA NICOLE BRADFORD, No. 2:21-cv-1093-CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER MICHAEL PALLARES, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In light of the complexity of the issues involved, the court has determined the interests of justice require appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The Federal Defender is appointed to represent petitioner. 2. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order on the Federal Defender, Attention: Habeas Appointment. 3. Petitioner’s counsel shall contact Carl Fabian, who served as limited purpose appointed counsel, to make arrangements for receiving relevant records and documents. 4. Within 30 days from the date of this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.