AECIQ
Newman, Jr. v. AECIQ
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 EDWARD G. NEWMAN JR., No. 2:24-cv-1204 WBS AC individually and on behalf of all 13 others similarly situated, 14 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER1
15 v. 16 AECIQ, a California corporation, 17 Defendant. 18 19 ----oo0oo---- 20 Before the court is plaintiff Edward G. Newman Jr.’s 21 motion (Docket No. 16) to modify the scheduling order (Docket 22 No. 14). Plaintiff seeks to modify the deadlines for fact 23 discovery and filing motions as well as the dates for the 24 pretrial conference and jury trial in the court’s scheduling 25 order. (Docket No. 16.) Defendant AECIQ opposes only extending 26
27 1 The motion is decided on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The scheduled April 28, 28 2025 hearing on the motion is hereby VACATED. 1 the deadlines related to discovery. (Docket No. 17.) 2 The pretrial scheduling order set the discovery 3…