AECIQ

Newman, Jr. v. AECIQ

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20252:24-cv-01204California881 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 EDWARD G. NEWMAN JR., No. 2:24-cv-1204 WBS AC individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION TO MODIFY

SCHEDULING ORDER1

v. AECIQ, a California corporation, Defendant. 18 ----oo0oo---- Before the court is plaintiff Edward G. Newman Jr.’s motion (Docket No. 16) to modify the scheduling order (Docket No. 14). Plaintiff seeks to modify the deadlines for fact discovery and filing motions as well as the dates for the pretrial conference and jury trial in the court’s scheduling order. (Docket No. 16.) Defendant AECIQ opposes only extending

The motion is decided on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The scheduled April 28, 2025 hearing on the motion is hereby VACATED. the deadlines related to discovery. (Docket No. 17.) The pretrial scheduling order set the discovery 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.