Sparkman

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAULA SPARKMAN, on behalf of No. 2:24-cv-01206-DJC-CKD herself and others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 COMERICA BANK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has submitted their proposed plan to provide class notice and the 18 proposed notice materials for approval. (See Mot. (ECF No. 53); see also Chandler 19 Decl. (ECF No. 54).) Defendants have indicated their non-opposition to the proposed 20 notices and notice plan. (See ECF No. 58.) Having reviewed Plaintiff’s proposed 21 notice plan and notice materials, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s proposal will provide 22 the best notice that is practicable under the circumstances and grants Plaintiff’s 23 Motion. 24 I. Legal Standard 25 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(2)(B), for classes certified under 26 Rule 23(b)(3), “the court must direct to class members the best notice that is 27 practicable under the circumstances, including individual notice to all members who 28 can be identified through reasonable…