Sparkman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAULA SPARKMAN, on behalf of No. 2:24-cv-01206-DJC-CKD herself and others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 COMERICA BANK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has submitted their proposed plan to provide class notice and the proposed notice materials for approval. (See Mot. (ECF No. 53); see also Chandler Decl. (ECF No. 54).) Defendants have indicated their non-opposition to the proposed notices and notice plan. (See ECF No. 58.) Having reviewed Plaintiff’s proposed notice plan and notice materials, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s proposal will provide the best notice that is practicable under the circumstances and grants Plaintiff’s Motion. I. Legal Standard Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(2)(B), for classes certified under Rule 23(b)(3), “the court must direct to class members the best notice that is practicable under the circumstances, including individual notice to all members who can be identified through reasonable…