(PS) Umberger v. City of Folsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20252:24-cv-01169California1,156 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE P. UMBERGER, II, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-1169-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CITY OF FOLSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs bring this action against thirteen defendants1 in connection with a SWAT raid on their residence in Folsom, California. The complaint’s allegations are, for screening purposes, sufficient to state a cognizable claim, and I will direct service on defendants. I will also grant plaintiffs’ applications to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF Nos. 2, 3, & 4, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2).2 Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and

1 The named defendants are the City of Folsom, Joseph Howard, Brian Lockhart, Roman Kehm, Zachary Wells, John Wagner, Brandon Monsoor, Paul…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.