Jones

(HC) Brooks v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20252:24-cv-02084California1,847 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROY BROOKS, No. 2:24-cv-2084 DC CSK P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 GENA JONES, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a petition for a 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 Petitioner challenges the denial of the request to recall and resentence petitioner, claiming 20 he is entitled to resentencing under California Penal Code § 1172.1. (ECF No. 1 at 4-12.) 21 Respondent’s fully briefed motion to dismiss is before the Court. 22 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires the district court to dismiss a 23 petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the petition . . . that the petitioner is not entitled to relief.” 24 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. 25 As discussed below, the Court recommends that the petition be dismissed with prejudice. 26 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 27 Petitioner was convicted in 2012 of assault…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.