Cardoza

(PC) Holmes v. Cardoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20252:24-cv-02190California962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE HOLMES, Case No. 2:24-cv-2190-WBS-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS N. CARDOZA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se in this closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action, in which she alleged defendants violated her Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to adequate health care and to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. ECF No. 1. In her complaint, she listed her address as Stanton Correctional Facility’s P.O. Box. Id. at 1. Two months after plaintiff filed her complaint, I ordered plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to prosecute, and failure to comply with court orders. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff did not respond, causing me to recommend that the action be dismissed. ECF No. 6 at 1. I acknowledged that it appeared from the docket that the order to show cause was returned as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.