Cardoza

(PC) Holmes v. Cardoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20252:24-cv-02190California962 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOMINIQUE HOLMES, Case No. 2:24-cv-2190-WBS-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 N. CARDOZA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se in this closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights 19 action, in which she alleged defendants violated her Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to 20 adequate health care and to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. ECF No. 1. In her 21 complaint, she listed her address as Stanton Correctional Facility’s P.O. Box. Id. at 1. Two 22 months after plaintiff filed her complaint, I ordered plaintiff to show cause why the case should 23 not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to prosecute, and failure to comply with 24 court orders. ECF No. 5. 25 Plaintiff did not respond, causing me to recommend that the action be dismissed. ECF 26 No. 6 at 1. I acknowledged that it appeared from the docket that the order to show cause was 27 returned as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.