J.M.

J.M. v. Red Roof Franchising, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20252:24-cv-03384California1,064 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.M., No. 2:24-cv-03384-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER v. Red Roof Franchising, LLC, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff seeks permission to use a pseudonym (the initials “J.M.”) in this action and to amend her complaint. See Pseudonym Mot., ECF No. 2; Mot. Am., ECF No. 20. Defendant Red Roof Franchising, LLC does not oppose either motion. See Notices, ECF Nos. 29-30. Defendant PDK Hospitality, LLC was served with summons in this action, but it has not appeared, and it has filed no response to plaintiff's motions. See Summons, ECF No. 3; Proof of Serv., ECF No. 16. 22 As explained in this order, the court grants both motions. Parties must normally “use their real names” in federal courts. Doe v. Kamehameha 24 Sch./Bernice Pauahi Bishop Est., 596 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010). This presumption implements the public’s “general right to inspect and copy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.