Martinez

Martinez v. Ford Motor Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20252:25-cv-00415California1,952 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ----oo0oo---- 9 10 OLGA MARTINEZ, and JONATHAN No. 2:25-cv-415 WBS CSK

FLORES MARTINEZ,

11 Plaintiffs, 12 ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND1 v. 13 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware 14 corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16

17 ----oo0oo---- 18 19 Plaintiffs Olga Martinez and Jonathan Flores Martinez 20 (“plaintiffs”) filed this action in state court on December 26, 21 2024, against defendant Ford Motor Company (“defendant”) alleging 22 breaches of express and implied warranties under the Song-Beverly 23 Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1794, as well as fraudulent inducement and 24 negligent repair. (Docket No. 1-1 at 6-27.) After defendant 25 removed the case to this court (Docket No. 1), plaintiffs moved 26

27 1 The motion is decided on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The scheduled April 28, 28 2025 hearing on the motion is hereby VACATED. 1 to remand. (Docket Nos. 6, 8.) Defendant opposes the instant 2 motion. (Docket No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.