Villery

Villery v. Crounse

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202523-1946California328 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JARED M. VILLERY, No. 23-1946 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 1:18-cv-01623-JLT-SKO v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAVID CROUNSE; ALICIA

GUERRERO; TODD HAAK; EDWARD

GARCIA; K. HOLLAND; R. GROVES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Former California state prisoner Jared M. Villery appeals pro se from the

district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action alleging retaliation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review for an abuse of discretion the denial of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.