Toney

Toney v. the Clorox Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202524-2567California752 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEFFREY TONEY, No. 24-2567 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:22-cv-05730-BHS v.

MEMORANDUM*

THE CLOROX COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 4, 2025 Portland, Oregon

Before: BYBEE and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and RODRIGUEZ, District

Judge.**

Plaintiff-Appellant Jeffrey Toney, a white male, appeals the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Xavier Rodriguez, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. grant of The Clorox Company’s summary judgment motion dismissing his claims of

age, gender, and racial discrimination under the Washington Law Against

Discrimination, Revised Code of Washington § 49.60.180. We have jurisdiction

under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.