Rubio-Pelayo

Rubio-Pelayo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202523-858California393 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUMBERTO RUBIO-PELAYO, No. 23-858 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-081-886 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 3, 2025 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: W. FLETCHER, WALLACH,** and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

An immigration judge denied Humberto Rubio-Pelayo’s request to cancel his

removal after finding that his spouse would not suffer exceptional and extremely

unusual hardship if he were removed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D). The Board

of Immigration Appeals affirmed. Rubio-Pelayo petitions for our review of that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Evan J. Wallach, United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. decision. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition.

1. We lack jurisdiction to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.