Moraga

Moraga v. Minev

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202524-160California580 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROY D. MORAGA, No. 24-160 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:21-cv-00482-MMD-CSD v.

MEMORANDUM*

M. MINEV; J. ISAACSON; D. RICHARD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 1, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Roy Moraga, a Nevada state prisoner, claims

that Dr. Michael Minev, Nurse Jessica Rambur, and Nurse Danielle Richard

(collectively, the “Defendants”) violated the Eighth Amendment by denying him

monitoring and treatment for Hepatitis C (“Hep-C”). The district court granted

summary judgment to the Defendants. We have jurisdiction over Moraga’s appeal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and, reviewing de novo, see Gordon v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.