Lee v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202524-1840California823 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAI LEE, No. 24-1840 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:22-cv-00548-LB v.

MEMORANDUM*

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel D. Beeler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 10, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

In this insurance coverage dispute, Kai Lee, the plaintiff, appeals the district

court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant, State Farm General Insurance

Company. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, we

affirm. See Newbery Corp. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 95 F.3d 1392, 1398 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Cir. 1996).

1. The district court correctly concluded that the Policy unambiguously

prohibits stacking by its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.