Gulkarov
Gulkarov v. Plum, Pbc
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202524-2766California1,190 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IN RE: PLUM BABY FOOD LITIGATION No. 24-2766 D.C. No. 4:21-cv-00913-YGR
LUDMILA GULKAROV; JANINE
TORRENCE; KELLY MCKEON; JOSH
CRAWFORD; VANESSA MEMORANDUM*
MATHIESEN; AUTUMN
ELLISON; JESSICA DAVID; SARAH
BROWN; TOMMY NURRE; CHRISTINA
GONZALEZ, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
PLUM, PBC, a Delaware corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 3, 2025 San Francisco, California
Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. In this putative class action, Plaintiffs allege that Plum, PBC (“Plum”),
which manufactures and sells baby foods, violated California’s Consumer Legal
Remedies Act (“CLRA”) and Unfair…