Fischer

Fischer v. White

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202524-494California890 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ILIANA FISCHER, No. 24-494 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:22-cv-08019-JFW-PVC v. MEMORANDUM*

ANGELA WHITE, also known as Blac Chyna,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 31, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Iliana Fischer sued Defendant-Appellee Angela White,

a/k/a Blac Chyna, for copyright infringement. White filed a motion for judgment

on the pleadings, and Fischer failed to file a timely opposition. The district court

granted White’s motion pursuant to Central District of California Local Rule 7-12,

which provides that “[t]he failure to file any required document, or the failure to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.