Bondi

Cordoba Rivas v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202523-3141California1,432 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMELDA DEL CARMEN CORDOBA No. 23-3141 RIVAS; ALEX ENMANUEL Agency Nos.

BALTODANO CORDOBA, A220-311-866

A220-311-867

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 4, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.

Emelda Del Carmen Cordoba Rivas and her minor son, A.E., petition for

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). appeals from orders of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying A.E.’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.