Hogan

Hogan v. DeAngelis Construction CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 2025A166172California1,415 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

BACKGROUND

A Brief History of this Litigation The parties are familiar with the history of this case, which we briefly described in 2019 as follows. In 2002, the Hogans sued the Developers, “asserting claims related to the Hogans’ purchase of a home in 2000. . . . [T]he Hogans alleged the home was defective in various ways and defendants failed

1 to disclose material facts about the home. [This lawsuit] resulted in a trial court order rescinding the purchase agreement for the home, a jury trial on consequential damages, a judgment (sometimes referred to as the ‘modified amended judgment’), many appeals, and six appellate decisions by this court.1 Most recently, in 2018, we ordered the trial court to deem the judgment satisfied as to the Developers.” (Hogan v. Deangelis Construction, Inc. (A152771, Aug. 30, 2019) [nonpub. opn.] 2019 WL 4127270.)2 Later, in 2022, we wrote, “We do not repeat the history of this case, which the parties are familiar with and which is set out in our prior decisions. In brief, the parties’ litigation over the rescission of a contract to purchase a home (the Gardenview property) resulted in a modified amended judgment filed by the trial court in April…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.