Lafrades

Van Huisen v. Lafrades

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202524-6485California266 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, No. 24-6485 D.C. No. 5:23-cv-04800-PCP Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

ERIC LAFRADES; ERIC CAFRADES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California P. Casey Pitts, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Gregory Scott Van Huisen appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Hayes v. Idaho Corr. Ctr., 849 F.3d 1204,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1208…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.