United States v. Van Sickle
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-7870 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-10119-RBM-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
TROY CLINTON VAN SICKLE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Ruth Bermudez Montenegro, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2025**
Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Troy Clinton Van Sickle appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the sentence of 14 months’ imprisonment and 22 months’ supervised
release imposed upon the revocation of his supervision. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Van Sickle contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing…