Roberts
United States v. Roberts
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-5610 D.C. No. 2:22-cr-00377-AB-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ALEX SCOTT ROBERTS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2025**
Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Alex Scott Roberts appeals from the district court’s order denying his
motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Though the district court acknowledged that Roberts was eligible to be
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). resentenced under Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines, it determined
that the 18 U.S.C. §…