Roberts

United States v. Roberts

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202524-5610California363 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-5610 D.C. No. 2:22-cr-00377-AB-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ALEX SCOTT ROBERTS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Alex Scott Roberts appeals from the district court’s order denying his

motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Though the district court acknowledged that Roberts was eligible to be

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). resentenced under Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines, it determined

that the 18 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.