Iglesias
United States v. Iglesias
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-4886 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:05-cr-00232-DMG-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
FRANK IGLESIAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2025**
Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Frank Iglesias appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion for early termination of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1).
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Contrary to Iglesias’s assertion, the district court applied the correct legal
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). standard and did not abuse its discretion in concluding that…