Sternberg

Sternberg v. Warneck

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202524-7206California313 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL C. STERNBERG, No. 24-7206 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01466-APG-EJY Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

SHELLEY WARNECK; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JEFF ROSEN; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Michael C. Sternberg appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his motions for a preliminary injunction in his action alleging federal and state law

claims arising out of state child custody proceedings. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We review for an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.